Only one more qualifier is left and that is the Serbia-Kazakhstan one that had to be postponed because of snowy conditions in Belgrade's Partizan Stadium. Even though the game will be played for sure, it doesn't make any difference at this point since neither team can qualify anyway.
In this entry, I would liek to list the teams that have qualified and will join co-hosts Austria and Swizterland in the finals. I will also make note of who qualified as first and second in the group as well. The W-L-T record thatI include is the teams' qualifying record only.
Group A1.
Poland (8-2-4, 24 goals scored, 12 conceded, 28 points)Poland has a strong force in Europe for the past few years, but they have yet to qualify for a Euro Cup until now. At first glance, any soccer fan would see that they must have played a very good qualifying campaign in a group with Portugal, runner up in the 2004 Euro Cup, was in. Serbia also posed some serious threats to Poland's campaign as well.
2.
Portugal (7-1-6, 24 goals scored, 10 conceded, 27 points)Portugal played very good qualifying campaign, but was only able to come in second in group A. The reason for this was there struggle to get wins instead of ties later in the qualifying round.
Here are the final
GROUP A STANDINGSGroup B1.
Italy (9-1-2, 22 goals scored, 9 conceded, 29 points)The 2006 World Cup Champions had a slow start to their qualification campaign, but they were able to come and not only qualify, but also qualify at the top of their group. However, they have to do much more to convince me that they're the best in the world or even in Europe. I still feel that their World Cup win was a fluke because of the way they eliminated Australia in the Round of 16. Maybe I will change my mind but not yet. The main reason I feel this way is because their qualifying chances were in doubt until the very end when Scotland lost with a last gasp Italian goal that put Italy to the top. That is how close it was for Italy, France, and Scotland, the top three teams in this group.
2.
France (8-2-2, 25 goals, 5 conceded, 26 points)Another close call...same situation as Italy...almost didn't qualify because of the threat coming from Scotland. For a team that is runner up of the 2006 World Cup and only lost to Italy on penalty kicks, they can in no way be the best in Europe. Scotland defintely spoiled a lot for these teams until the very end.
Here are the final
GROUP B standings. Group C1.
Greece (10-1-1, 25 goals, 10 conceded, 31 points)The 2004 Euro Cup champions did not qualify for the World Cup which eventually convinced me that their Euro Cup win was a fluke, but sudently their back in the Euro Cup and I have no idea how. Impressive record, but they still have yet to convince me that they are a superpower. Sorry Greece supporters! First, make it to a World Cup and make it to the round of 16, then I'll be convinced. Also, don't forget that the Greeks played a very close game that they won narrowly 3-2 against the Bosnians, who were also played very well at the beginning, but then started to lose a lot of games at the end. If greece was really that good, they shoudl beat Bosnia by a much larger goal differential, but the Bosnians were close to qualifying at one point and were even in second place at one point.
2.
Turkey (7-2-3, 25 goals, 11 conceded, 24 points)They are a good team. In the 2002 World Cup, they won third place, but then they suddenly fell into the shadows, only to come back now. They did lose once to Bosnia in Sarajevo 3-2, which they correctd at their home game in a 1-0 win later, ending the qualifiers with an aggragate score of 2-2 against the Bosnians. I do wish the Bosnians qualified over Turkey or Greece. They were so close at one point too!!
Here are the final standings for
GROUP C.GROUP D1.
Czech Republic (9-1-2, 27 goals, 5 conceded, 29 points)I became a supporter of the Czech national team in 2004 when they qualified for the Euro Cup for the first time. They had an impressive 3-0-0 record in the group round and were then eliminated in their first game in the quarterfinals. In the 2006 World Cup, their first world cup, they humiliated the United States in their opening match and then lost to Ghana and Italy. I did not support the Czech Republic as much in this World Cup though as I was mor einterested in the US National Team. It seems as if they start off well in major competitions and then lose in the more important games later on.
2.
Germany (8-1-3, 35 goals, 7 conceded, 27 points) There are several facts that point at Germeny as the best team in Europe and possible Euro Cup favorites. First, they scored the most goals in qualifying. Secondly, they were the first team to qualify very early on. This is why I was extremely disspointed and surprised that they let the Czechs win in the game after they clinched the finals. This also costed them first place in the group. I will never understand this. However, I still believe that they are best in Europe. Best in the world is pushing it though. As a matter of fact, I don't feel as if any team really stands out with that title right now although I used to regard Brazil in that light but they really disspointed me in their early elimination in the 2006 World Cup.
Here are the final rankings for
GROUP DGROUP E1.
Croatia (9-1-2, 28 goals, 8 goals conceded,29 points)EXCELLENT qualifying campaign this Euro Cup season. They are not exactly a world superpower yet, but they are close. They are, however, a stand out in the Balkans and went up a lot in the world rankings since qualifying began. I just wish Croatia didn't lose to Macedonia 2-0 the second time, giving them one loss and that they didn't remain undefeated. However, this Euro cup qualifying round proved to be very competetive with some really good teams not making it because the groups were so competetive, so it was somewhat expected that no team will come out without atleast one loss, but Croatia made a big achievement goign as far as they did without a loss until the second to last match. Israel, Russia, and Macedonia proved to be big spoliers. Russia was the biggest of them all, knocking out England and qualifying themselves. Just awesome. In my opinion, this was the only group that ended with a really surprising result. This could defintely be Croatia's new 1998, and it would awesome to be in Croatia for the event just like I was about ten years before for the 1998 World Cup.
2.
Russia (7-2-3, 18 goals, 7 conceded, 24 points)I'm still laughing at England's elimination. The "Three Lions" as teh team is nicknamed think they are the best in the world and that they can't make any mistakes. Good job Russia! You defintely deserve it! Gus Hindink from the Netherlands is one of the best coaches in the world and I think it is great of him to move from country to country transforming once rejects to respected national teams. In last ten years, he coached Netherlands (led his native national team in the 1998 world cup third place match where they lost to then underdog Croatia), South Korea (led the team to the round of 16 at the 2002 World Cup), Australia (led the team past the group stage in the 2006 world cup and helped Australians of Croatian descent playing for Australia get past the emotional struggles of having to play their childhood friends that used to live in Australia. he also led them to the round of 16 where they suffered an unfortunate controversial loss to Italy), and now Russia. However, being that Hindink is in demand by many countries, he might have to leave Russia before the Euro Cup beings next summer. The US needs a coach like him, but belive or not, the US Soccer Federation, being that soccer is not a very big sport in the United States, doe snot have enough money to pay a big named coach liek Hindink. Other than Macedonia and Israel, who fought hard against Croatia, Russia was the only other real threat to Croatia, giving Croatia their only ties--two 0-0 results.
Here are the final standings for
GROUP E.
GROUP F1.
Spain (9-2-1, 23 goals, 8 conceded, 28 points)Spain wsa always an overrated team in my opinion, but they have one impressive 3-0 shutout against Sweden. I don't really much else to say about Spain. I didn't watch too many of their games.
2.
Sweden (8-2-2, 23 goals, 9 conceded, 26 points)Sweden is one team that have always supported, and they usually play very well. However, there was one incident at one game involving a fan that I feel UEFA trated very unfairly. In a nail-biting match against Scandinavian rival Denmark, Sweden sscored 3 goals int he first half. Denamrk controlled the second half where the Dnaish scored three to tie it. With about a minute left in the match, the coach awarded Swden a penalty kick, fair enough, being that I support Sweden, I was actually about this, a hcance to win it 4-3. Suddenly, an angry Danish fan ran into the field and punched the ref forcing him to abandon the game. The disciplinary committee investigated and decided to reset Denmark's goals to 0 making the score 3-0Sweden win. This did not make a difference in the standings anyway, but if a tie breaker was necessary and went down to goal difference, Sweden would have won it making this extrememly unfair on UEFA's part. Denamrk, howeevr, did not do very well in its remaining games so it would not have mattered anyway.
Here are the final standings for
GROUP F.Group G1.
Romania (9-1-2, 26 goals,7 conceded, 29 points)I never realized Romania was such a good team until now. Until this past Saturday's matches, Romania and Croatia were the only two teams that were undefeated in their qualifying matches, and after that day's matches, they each received a loss. I am really excite to see how romania does in the finals.
2.
Netherlands (8-2-2, 15 goals, 5 conceded, 26 points)Netherlands used to be a world superpower, but recently they have getting worse. In the 2006 World Cup, they were esurprisingly eliminated by a weaker team in the round of 16. Luckily, there future is really bright after their Under 21 national team won the most recent Under 21 Championship and with that qualified for the 2008 Olympics Soccer Tournament.
Here are the final standings for
Group GWith 14 teams now qualified and joning the co-hosts Aistria and Switxerland in the 16team field, it is now time for the next step: the final drawing ceremony in Lucerne, Switzerland on Sunday December 2, 2007. At this event, the 16 teams are draw in to four groups of four in which they will play each member only once. The top 2 teams in each group then move into the elimination round. The winner of the 2008 Euro Cup represents UEFA in teh 2009 Confederations Cup in South Africa, a pre-World Cup tournament in which the champions of each continental tournament (Euro Cup, Asian Cup, Oceanian Cup, Cup of African Nations, the Gold Cup, and the Copa America), the current World Cup champion, and the host play in an 8 team competition to see if there were any major changes in the previous World Cup and see how the World Cup hosts are progressing in their preperations.